Why Most Hiring Processes Fail

One of the most common things I hear from companies that are struggling to hire is this: “We just can’t find the right candidates.”

And I get it. When hiring stalls, the instinct is to blame the market — there aren’t enough qualified people, the talent pool is thin, candidates aren’t interested, or the recruiters aren’t finding the right people. In some markets, supply genuinely is tight. But even in those cases, companies with clearly defined roles consistently hire faster and better than those without them.

The problem is almost always the process. More specifically, it’s a lack of clarity around what success actually looks like in the role you’re trying to fill.

---

You’re solving the wrong problem

Here’s how it usually goes. Something is wrong. The team has too much work. A department is underperforming. You’ve got a growth goal that your current headcount can’t support. There’s real pain, and there’s urgency to fix it.

So you jump into job description creation. You start thinking about budget. You open the role with your recruiting team or an agency. All of that activity kicks off before you’ve actually answered the most important question:

What does success look like in this role — not just day-to-day, but for the business?

That question sounds simple. It almost never gets answered well enough before hiring begins.

---

It’s a root cause problem

Think about how you’d approach any other business problem that isn’t working. You’d do a root cause analysis. You’d go back to the beginning and ask: did we scope this properly? Did we actually understand what we were solving for before we started executing?

Hiring rarely gets that same discipline. Instead, organizations move from problem directly to job posting, skipping the step that would make everything downstream easier.

A few years ago I worked with a company in a specialized go-to-market space. They kept running into the same wall — candidates who didn’t have the right experience, couldn’t demonstrate the right track record, or struggled to understand the business. The feedback was always some version of: they’re just not the right fit.

But when you dig into it, the real issue emerges. If the people doing the screening don’t have a clear picture of what “right” actually looks like, they’re guessing. What you end up with is a job description built around activities — a list of things someone will do — rather than the outcomes they need to drive. And when your criteria are activity-based instead of impact-based, every interview becomes a gut-check rather than a genuine assessment.

---

What it looks like when companies get this right

The companies that hire well ask a different set of questions before they ever post a role.

Not “what will this person do?” but “what problems must this role solve in the first six to twelve months?” Not “what does the job look like?” but “how will this role move the business forward, and what does success look like when it’s working?”

When those answers are clear before you start, everything else gets sharper. The job description actually describes the job. Interview questions connect to real criteria. Candidates understand the role and what they’re walking into.

The companies that hire well don’t start with job descriptions. They start with clarity.

---

A simple way to frame any role before you hire

Before you open a search, define three things. Together, these make up what I’d call an ideal candidate profile — not unlike how strong sales teams build an ideal customer profile.

• The Problem — The Why

  Why are you doing this search? What specific business problem is this role solving? Look honestly at your team’s real gaps — diverse skills and experiences consistently outperform teams weighted in one direction.

• The Outcomes — What Success Looks Like

  Can the candidate connect their work to business outcomes — not just execute tasks, but understand why those tasks move things forward? That’s a signal worth testing for regardless of seniority.

• The Capabilities — How They’ll Get There

  This is where most job descriptions live — but it’s the last question, not the first. Once you know the problem and the outcomes, get specific about the skills, experience, and motivators required to deliver them.

---

When hiring isn’t working, the instinct is to look at the market, the sourcing strategy, the recruiters. Sometimes those things are factors. But more often than not, the issue started before any of that — in how the role was defined, or wasn’t. Quality problems almost always trace back to the same place: not enough clarity at the start.

How does your organization define a role before opening a search? What’s working — and what isn’t?